Will of Dennett
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The attack by appellants here upon the result reached by the trial court may be summarized as presenting questions concerning the legal effect of and rights given by and under the three contracts of December, 1913, on the theory that fraud was perpetrated by Mr. Hill, an executor, in presenting an incorrect copy of his contract and by omitting any. reference to the Henry contract in the claim filed by the bank; in rulings on evidence; and lastly, that there was no final order for payment under sec. 313.17, Stats.
The contract between Dennett and Moeser of December, 1913, identical in form with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Starkweather v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Kilkelly v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Mertz v. FlemingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Ætna Insurance v. FowlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Hecht v. ShennersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Fuchs v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Depner v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945