Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 14, 1982No. CA CR 81-162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

Appellant, Ray Hugh Neal, was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery, and his only argument for reversal is that the trial court should not have admitted an in-court identification that followed lineup procedures violating appellant’s constitutional right to the presence of counsel. His argument is without merit.

Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to the State, as we must do on appeal, the evidence indicates that after appellant had been identified in a photo spread, he was taken to the Pulaski County Sheriff’s Office and placed in a lineup with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reichert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API