Neal v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lawson Cloninger, Judge.
Appellant, Ray Hugh Neal, was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery, and his only argument for reversal is that the trial court should not have admitted an in-court identification that followed lineup procedures violating appellant’s constitutional right to the presence of counsel. His argument is without merit.
Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to the State, as we must do on appeal, the evidence indicates that after appellant had been identified in a photo spread, he was taken to the Pulaski County Sheriff’s Office and placed in a lineup with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reichert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985