Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Littell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 27, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

•A bill of complaint was filed by Alfred G. Stumpf to foreclose a mortgage made by Violet McGregor Littell and husband, the defendants, for the sum of $4,000. The mortgagors there*483upon filed an answer alleging that the money on said bond and mortgage was not due at the time of the filling of the bill, and at the same time filed a counter-claim alleging that on May 18th, 1909, the Littells executed a lease to Joseph Formanns, who, at the time, they say, was acting in behalf of Formanns, Stumpf & Sharpe, a partnership, in which Alfred G. Stumpf and Joseph Formanns were the only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Pitts v. WaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Bosworth v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Harvey v. PennypackerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1872
  5. Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. GambleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1852
  2. Rouse v. PollardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API