Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 15, 1997, which assessed B.P. Associates for additional unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

Claimant was an outside salesperson for B.P. Associates, a manufacturer’s representative. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was an employee of B.P. Associates rather than an independent contractor and assessed B.P. Associates for additional unemployment insurance contributions. We affirm. Claimant worked full time for B.P.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BraunsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Woods v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FratelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of VossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re the Claim of McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Matter of Rosenblum (Tura, Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API