Legal Opinion

Dye v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 2000No. CA CR 99-1023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARGARET Meads, Judge.

Jerry Dye was convicted by a Sebastian County jury of stalking in the second degree and sentenced to 120 months in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred (1) in denying his motion for directed verdict; (2) in denying his motion for a continuance; and (3) in admitting evidence of guns and ammunition which was irrelevant to the crime charged and was more prejudicial than probative. We affirm.

A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, which we consider before any other points on appeal.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Dodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API