Legal Opinion

Dianne K. Mooney v. Kenneth Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2001No. 00-2538Unpublished

1Per curiam

Dianne K. Mooney sought disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, claiming neurofibromatosis disabled her. An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits, holding Mooney’s 1987 employment constituted substantial gainful activity precluding her from meeting the disability requirements rather than an unsuccessful work attempt as Mooney alleged. Mooney sought judicial review, and the district court * concluded substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s decision. On appeal, Mooney argues her 1987 employment was an unsuccessful work attempt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lavada J. Nettles v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Tom KING, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API