Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & L. Ry. Co. v. Harrison

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 6, 1899No. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Ihe Circuit Court of the United Slates for the District of Indiana. The appellant, the Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Company, is the purchaser at foreclosure sale, through Joshua Twing Brooks, of the' property of the Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Company, and as such intervenes in the proceedings for distribution of funds in the hands of the receiver, to procure payment out of a so-called “Logansport Fund” of five-sixths of an installment of interest on a…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Ihe Circuit Court of the United Slates for the District of Indiana. The appellant, the Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Company, is the purchaser at foreclosure sale, through Joshua Twing Brooks, of the' property of the Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Company, and as such intervenes in the proceedings for distribution of funds in the hands of the receiver, to procure payment out of a so-called “Logansport Fund” of five-sixths of an installment of interest on a prior mortgage and two-thirds of the taxes, which were liens against the property at date of sale, but-became due after…

1Opinion of the CourtSeaman, District Judge

The general doctrine is well settled that there is no warranty in judicial sales; that the maxim caveat emptor applies, and the purchaser takes the property without recourse for tax liens or other in-cumbrances or defects in the title. The Monte Allegre, 9 Wheat. 616, 648; Osterberg v. Trust Co., 93 U. S. 424, 428; U. S. v. Duncan, 4 McLean, 607, Fed. Cas. No. 15,003; Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co., 84 Fed. 744; Ror. Jud. Sales, *911§§ 458, 459. In the argument oí counsel on behalf of the appellant this rule is recognized, but with the assertion that it operates…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Monte AllegreSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. United States v. DuncanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1850
  3. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  2. United States v. RizzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Tennessee Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API