Legal Opinion
Holden v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The reservation of a mere “ right of way ” under the decisions included only the right of passage over the surface of the land (Thompson v. Orange & Rockland Elec. Co., 254 N. Y. 366; Osborne v. Auburn Tel. Co., 189 N. Y. 393; Eels v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 143 N. Y. 133; Ferguson v. Producers Gas Co., 286 App. Div. 521; Matter of Bensel, 140 App. Div. 257). No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Taking no part: Judge Burke.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eels v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Thompson v. Orange & Rockland Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Osborne v. . Auburn Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- In re BenselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Ferguson v. Producers Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- U.S. Cablevision Corp. v. TheodoreuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cannon Point North, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1983