Legal Opinion
Roti v. Roti
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 10, 2006No. 1-05-0496PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE McNULTY
delivered the opinion of the court:
Michael Roti sued his cousin Samuel Roti for breach of contract and on a theory of promissory estoppel. The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that the Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/2 (West 1996)) barred the claim because Michael sought an interest in lands without a signed contract to support the claim. In a proposed amended complaint Michael pled that he sought only a percentage of the profit Samuel earned from the sale of land. In the alternative, Michael sought relief in quantum meruit. The trial court disallowed the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Payne v. Mill Race InnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Carroll v. PaddockIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Lawlor v. North American Corp. of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- In re: Felipe N. Gomez v. Frank J. Kokoszka, as Chapter 7 TrusteeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.