Legal Opinion

Reefer Express Lines Pty., Ltd. v. General Authority for Supply Commodities

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1989No. 88 Civ. 7833 (RWS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The General Authority for Supply Commodities (“GASC”), a department in the Ministry of Supply of the government of Egypt, opposes pre-judgment interest on an arbitrator’s award rendered against it and in favor of Reefer Express Lines (“Reefer”).

Pre-judgment interest on an arbitration award is at the discretion of the district court, but is usually permitted, and should be granted “in the absence of exceptional circumstances.” See Larsen v. A. C. Carpenter, Inc., 620 F.Supp. 1084, 1125 (E.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986); Mitsui & Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitsui & Co. v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. Larsen v. A.C. Carpenter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  3. United States v. Peavey Barge LineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Dow Chemical Pacific Ltd. v. Rascator Maritime S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API