Legal Opinion

Colter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1928No. 11633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

After the charge had been read to the jury and the District Attorney had proceeded at some length with his argument, appellant’s counsel requested that the court instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence. In Art. 660, C. C. P., 1925, it is stated:

“After the argument begins no further charge shall be given to the jury unless required by the improper argument of counsel or the request of the jury, or unless the judge shall, in his discretion, permit the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulshear v. RandonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Wade v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Stork v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API