Legal Opinion
Nora D. SATTY, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NASHVILLE GAS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1975No. 75-1083PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
After exhausting her remedies through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, this action was initiated by Nora Satty against the Nashville Gas Company for alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The District Court after hearing testimony from plaintiff denied her motion for a temporary injunction but thereafter on November 4, 1974 awarded reinstatement with seniority, back pay, including sick leave, and attorney fees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Undisputed the facts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Darrell D. Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Nashville Gas Co. v. SattySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 633, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,169 Theodore Kolb v. Goldring, Inc., Theodore Kolb v. Goldring, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDIA CORPORATION, a Corp., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.