Legal Opinion

Town of Samson v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1922No. 4 Div. 974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Chancery rule No. 75 is not applied to an order on application for receiver in pending cause, in support of which there was no evidence offered, but hearing had on bill and exhibits thereto and answer of respondent. Jackson v. Hooper, 107 Ala. 634, 18 South. 254; Jones v. Beverly, 45 Ala. 161.

The decree recited a submission upon the application of complainant for appointment of a receiver and, upon consideration by the court, of the bill, filed for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage executed by respondent to complainant as trustee, charging that the mortgaged' property is inadequate, etc.;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Jackson v. Hooper & NolenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Jones v. BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. State Ex Rel. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Totten v. HarloweDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  3. Green v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API