Legal Opinion

Romero Ex Rel. Romero v. New Mexico Health & Environment Department

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1988No. 17527PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review the dismissal of Arlene Romero’s tort action against the former New Mexico Health and Social Services Department, which was reorganized into the separate New Mexico Health and Environment Department (HED) and Human Services Department. The appropriate successor is HED. The district court ruled that Romero’s claim against HED was barred by the statute of limitations, by the Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 41-4-1 to -27 (Repl.Pamp. 1986), or under the common-law doctrine of sovereign immunity. The court of appeals affirmed on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Gray v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Board of Education, School District 16 v. StandhardtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. Cruz v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. US West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Autovest v. AgostoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API