Legal Opinion

Turnbow v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1934No. 4724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

In this ease, and in the case of W. C. Turn-bow et al., Appellants, v. Petroleum Production Corporation of Chicago, Appellee, No. 4725, on the docket of this court, the appel-lees were the plaintiffs in the trial court, and appellants were defendants in the trial court. A hearing was had in the trial court on the respective applications of the plaintiffs for the appointment of receivers in each of the two cases upon the same evidence, and the cases have been in this court consolidated for the purpose of submission. In the case of Howard P. Bishop et al., Plaintiffs, v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ortiz Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Crossman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitson Co. v. Bluff Creek Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Gunther v. DorffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Hughes v. Marshall National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Massad v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Fisher v. First Nat. Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API