Legal Opinion
Quezada v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*911Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violent conduct, harassment, physical interference, making threats, creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order and refusing to lock in. Initially, petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goncalves v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Salaam v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Odome v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Stanislas v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Youngblood v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abbas v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cunningham v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ruggia v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005