Legal Opinion
Solorio v. Muniz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2018No. 15-71979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pamela K. Critchfield (argued), Deputy Attorney General; Peggy S. Ruffra, Supervising Deputy Attorney General;
Before: Consuelo M. Callahan and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani,* Judge.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
The panel AMENDSits opinion in the above-captioned case filed May 8, 2018 as follows:
*916The sentence on page 17 of the slip opinion that states: < Weighing the considerable inculpatory evidence and the relatively gossamer allegedly exculpatory and impeachment evidence together, we find that Solorio fails to show by clear and convincing evidence that "no reasonable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Wearry v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Gregory L. Brown v. W. MunizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Bracey v. Superintendent Rockview SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Cap Export, LLC v. Zinus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Smith v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022