Legal Opinion
Szalay v. Handcock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 11, 1991No. 91-61Published
1Opinion of the Court
819 S.W.2d 684 (1991)
307 Ark. 232
George SZALAY, Appellant,
v.
Oscar L. HANDCOCK and Keystone Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 91-61.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
November 11, 1991.
R.H. Hixson, Paris, for appellant.
Eldon Coffman, Fort Smith, for appellees.
CORBIN, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an Arkansas court has authority under the Arkansas long-arm statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-4-101 (1987), and the due process clause, U.S. Const, amend. 14, to exercise jurisdiction over a foreign insurance company in a suit by the insured to recover under the insurance policy's…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.