Parks v. City of Des Moines
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentDe Grakk, J.
I cannot concur in the conclusion announced in the majority opinion. A municipality is not an insurer as to the condition of its sidewalks in relation to snow and ice. Under the facts in the instant case the controlling question is one of law and it is a question for the court to decide. The motion for a directed verdict on behalf of the defendant city at the conclusion of all the testimony should have been sustained. This statement is predicated on the- record before us. There is no evidence to establish either actual or constructive notice on the part of the city as to the defect which is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrington v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vonkey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Tobin v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Cooper v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.