Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank in Creston v. Francis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1984No. 69159Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

The effect of the majority opinion is to exalt form over substance. While acknowledging that the purpose of the section 554.-9402(1) description is to aid purchasers and third-party creditors in identifying the secured crops, J. White & R. Summers, Handbook of the Law Under the Uniform Commercial Code § 23-16 at 964 (2d ed. 1980), and that the Iowa cases and Code Comments place “inquiry” responsibility on purchasers and third-party creditors, the majority absolves the purchaser here of any responsibility. Finding the description not to signal a need for further inquiry, the majority ignores…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bank of N. America v. Bank of NutleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Improve MacHinery Inc. v. Delta Molded Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1976
  3. United States v. Big Z WarehouseDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  4. Smith v. . HedgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. First Security Bank & Trust Co. v. VoelkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API