Legal Opinion

People v. Storms

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1993No. 73658PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Rule 63(C)(1) of our Code of Judicial Conduct calls for a judge to disqualify himself in proceedings where his impartiality might reasonably be questioned (134 Ill. 2d R. 63(C)(1)), including those instances where the judge formerly “served as lawyer in the matter in controversy” (134 Ill. 2d R. 63(C)(1)(b)). In this case, we conclude that the trial court judge was not obligated under Rule 63 to recuse himself from sentencing the defendant in a criminal proceeding, where the evidence in aggravation considered by the trial judge included prior criminal convictions against the defendant and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. People v. Del VecchioIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. People v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. PotterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. State v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. People v. StormsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. State v. BunkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API