United States v. Garry D. Kern, United States of America v. Troy P. Reeves
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Troy B. Reeves (Reeves) and Garry D. Kern (Kern) appeal the judgment entered by the district court 1 following a jury’s finding of guilt on three bank-robbery-related counts. Specifically, Reeves and Kern (the defendants) contend the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of another subsequent robbery, when it refused to grant a new trial after the discovery of new evidence, and when it found as a matter of law that conspiracy to commit bank robbery is a crime of violence. For the reasons addressed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. James N. Barnes (93-6120) and Doyle R. Pate, Jr. (93-6149)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BeersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Willie C. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Billy D. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.