Merck & Co., Inc. v. Garza
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht
Respondents contend that Vioxx, a prescription drug, caused their decedent’s death. In Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Havner, 1 we set requirements for determining whether epidemiological evidence is scientifically reliable to prove causation. The parties here dispute what those requirements are, whether they apply in this case, and whether they were satisfied. We hold that Havner 1 s requirements apply and were not met, and that the evidence was therefore legally insufficient to prove causation. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals 2 and render judgment that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
3Cited by25 opinions
- Debra C. Gunn, M.D., Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P.A., and Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates P.L.L.C. v. Andre McCoy, as Permanent Guardian of Shannon Miles McCoy, an Incapacitated PersonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Casey v. Toyota Motor Engineering Manufacturing North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Tumlinson v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Tumlinson v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.