Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Badger Tobacco Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Plaintiffs assign as error the granting of the motion for a directed verdict as to the defendant Badger Tobacco Company and its insurer, Great American Indemnity Company, and the entering of judgment dismissing the complaint. The facts which are material on the questions raised on this appeal are simple and virtually undisputed. The defendant John Hartman was employed by the Badger Tobacco Company to drive its truck in delivering merchandise to its customers. John Hartman had heard that he was not to take other persons along for a ride, and on the day previous to the accident in suit he had…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Klix v. NiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Rolfe v. . HewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Driscoll v. ScanlonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. O'Leary v. FashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Foster-Herbert Cut Stone Co. v. PughTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Morris v. Dame'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. McVicar v. WR Arthur & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Farrell v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. Kuharski v. Somers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API