Henry v. State

I agree with the majority that unauthorized use of an automobile is a lesser included offense in the greater crime of larceny of the automobile itself and that guilty verdicts on *312both counts are not inconsistent and can be merged. Therefore, I concur in the majority’s affirmance of appellant’s conviction for larceny of the automobile. I also concur in the majority’s affirmance of appellant’s conviction for receipt of stolen goods. However, I disagree with the majority’s view that this record establishes that Judge Sodaro, in sentencing, considered appellant’s conduct before, during, and after…