Legal Opinion

Schick X-Ray Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 20, 1965No. 69701; protests 64/6325, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of anesthesia, breathing assistor, or resuscitation devices in chief value of steel similar in all material respects to those the subject of The E. I. M. Corp. v. United States (50 Cust. Ct. 138, C.D. 2402), except that the items marked “A” are chiefly used in hospitals as hospital utensils and the items marked “B” have as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained, as follows: The items marked “A” at 17 percent under the provision in paragraph 339,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O. E. M. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API