Commonwealth v. Seagraves

OPINION BY ALLEN, J.:

In this appeal, we address a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence imposed following a re-sentencing hearing in accordance with Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. *840Batts, 620 Pa. 115, 66 A.3d 286 (2013).1 We affirm.

Ian Thomas Seagraves (“Appellant”), then seventeen, and his adult co-defendant, Shawn Nicholas Freemore (“Freemore”), then nineteen, planned to lure the victim to an obscure location under a bridge. Although the victim believed he was meeting…