Legal Opinion

Washington County - Risk v. Jansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 29, 2012No. 0702346; A144114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the board erred in setting aside employer’s denial of claimant’s combined condition claim. Employer contends that the board erred by improperly allocating the burden of proof. Because we conclude that ORS 656.266 allocates to claimants the burden of proving that a compensable occupational disease remains the major contributing cause of a combined condition and the board assigned that burden to employer, we reverse and remand.

We take the pertinent facts from the board’s undisputed findings. Claimant has a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Insurance v. LydaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akins v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Keystone RV Co.-Thor Industries, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Fillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Evans v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API