Legal Opinion

Bills v. Shulsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1985No. 20008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The petitioner, who came to this state on an out-of-state parole granted by Arizona authorities, sought a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court challenging the validity of a detainer filed against him on the ground that the revocation of his Arizona parole by Arizona authorities was invalid. The district court denied the petition. We affirm.

In 1968, the petitioner was sentenced in Arizona to serve ten years to life for a second-degree murder conviction. In 1971, Arizona placed petitioner on parole which was to be served in Utah pursuant to the “Interstate Compact for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ogden v. KlundtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. People ex rel. Crawford v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Reddin v. MeekmaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagy v. AlvisOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Gibson v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. J. Castelonia v. PA DOC & PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. McGrew v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API