Legal Opinion

Homewood Investment Co. v. Wilt

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1981No. 11131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*380OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, J.:

Homewood Investment Company (Homewood), and Tom Gentry appeal from the judgment entered against them and in favor of Willard Wilt, dba Bill Wilt Electrical Contractor (Wilt), and Tahoe Plumbing Company, Inc. (Tahoe Plumbing). Homewood and Gentry, as Homewood’s indemnitor, were ordered to pay Wilt $40,469.28 with interest from the date of the filing of the complaint for materials delivered and labor furnished to Homewood. Homewood and Gentry were also ordered to pay Tahoe Plumbing $65,163.86 with interest from the date of the filing of the complaint for materials…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark County Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Christopher W. Ross, Individually and D/B/A 4r Ornamental Iron Company v. Imperial Construction Company, Inc. And Imperial Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Securities Inv. Co. of St. Louis v. DonnelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Calcot Assn. v. Coast Cotton MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. BILL WHITE ROOFING, ETC. v. Cedric's, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dobron v. BunchNevada Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API