Legal Opinion
Sacks v. Anne Realty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Motion by defendants Irving Weinstein and Michael Weinstein to dismiss the complaint upon the ground of insufficiency. Plaintiff sues for damages alleged to have been sustained on resale of premises at less than agreed contract sale price, occasioned by alleged breach by defendants of a contract of sale and purchase of certain lots at Edgemere, Queens county. *118The written sales contract is annexed to the complaint, and the parties thereto are therein recited as follows: “Agreement made and dated August 5, 1925, between Kitty Sacks, No. 1370 Broadway, New York City (Phone Pa. 8252) hereinafter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eaton v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Lamming v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- L-Tec Electronics Corporation v. Cougar Electronic Organization, Inc. Sol Mayer and Dan Reich, Individually and D/B/A Cougar Electronic OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- J. M. Lynne Co. v. GeraghtySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Prentice Corp. v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Rubenstein v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kenneth Pregno Agency, Ltd. v. LettereseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.