Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dallas County Pulpwood Co. v. Strange

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 1975No. 74-281Published

1Dissent

J. Fred Jones, Justice,

dissent. I do not agree with the majority opinion in this case. As I view the majority opinion, it comes close to nullifying a long line of our previous decisions wherein we have held that the Workmen’s Compensation Act does not call for general accident insurance. See Birchett v. Tuf-Nut Garment Mfg. Co., 205 Ark. 483, 169 S.W. 2d 574; Barrentine v. Dierks Lbr. & Coal Co., 207 Ark. 527, 181 S.W. 2d 485; Conatser v. D. W. Hoskins Truck Service, 210 Ark. 141, 194 S.W. 2d 680, and the many other digested cases, too numerous to mention.

As I view the majority opinion in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birchett v. Tuf-Nut Garment Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Parker Stave Company v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Massey v. Poteau Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Barrentine v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Conatser v. D. W. Hoskins Truck ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API