Legal Opinion

Nunez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York, and the defendants New York City Transit Authority and Judlau Contracting, Inc., separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated May 17, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike their separate answers for failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

A court is authorized to strike the pleadings of a party who “refuses to obey an order for disclosure or willfully fails to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mendez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Beneficial Mortgage Corp. v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Alto v. Gilman Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Kryzhanovskaya v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Careccia v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henderson-Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Giano v. IoannouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Bort v. PerperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Stinton v. Robin's Wood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Gradaille v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API