St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Capri Construction Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied.
Plaintiffs submissions in support of its motion for summary judgment fail to establish that the rates applied in calculating the additional premium allegedly due under the policy were those required to be applied according to its rating plans filed with the Superintendent of Insurance. Thus, issues of fact remain to be resolved, precluding the grant of summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor. Moreover, the case presents open questions concerning…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Essex Insurance v. Laruccia Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Di Pietro v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. StoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Safeguard Insurance v. E. Tetz & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. HemingwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.