Legal Opinion

Vrooman v. Burdett.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action on a contract, wherein appellant seeks judgment in the principal sum of fifty thousand dollars deferred payments under the contract hereinafter mentioned.

Respondents, during the progress of the trial, amended their answer and interposed the defense that the contract sued on had been modified and respondents released from their obligations thereunder. Appellant presents but one issue here, to-wit: There was no consideration to support the claimed modification of the original contract and the release of respondents, and, therefore, he was entitled to a directed verdict.

On August 4, 1922,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Macfarland v. HeimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Andrus v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Mount Vernon Car Manufacturing Co. v. Hirsch Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Missouri InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Rexite Casting Co. v. Midwest Mower Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Sayers v. BAGGRAFT CORP. OF AMERICAMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. B. H. Tureen Hotels, Inc. v. Nachman & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Bostian v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API