Legal Opinion

In re Yagman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

*31Respondent Stephen Yagman was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on March 17, 1975. He was also admitted to the practice of law in the State of California, where, at all times relevant herein, he has resided and practiced law.

By order dated September 16, 1998, the California Supreme Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in that state for three years, with two years of that suspension stayed, and probation for the full three years, for failure to communicate a written settlement offer to his clients,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re SorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re YagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re GelleneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re BlutrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BristolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In Re: STEPHEN YAGMANCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API