Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Darlington
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
In this action for the foreclosure of a tax lien on real property in the borough of Manhattan an order was made ex parte appointing the city treasurer as receiver of the rents and profits of that real property, and this motion to vacate that ex parte order is made by certain trustees who previously had been appointed by this court and were then in possession of that real property pursuant to such appointment.
The order appointing the receiver was made, and is sought to be sustained, under chapters 667 and 668 of the Laws of 1941, which added sections 415 (1) — 53.1 and 415 (l)-53.3 to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Colson v. PelgramNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schuehle v. . ReimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- W. I. M. Corp. v. CipuloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Propper v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1945