Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Thompson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1960No. Gen. 60-M-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, JUSTICE.

The plaintiff brought this action originally against the defendant, David Thompson, to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. Subsequently, plaintiff, by leave made General Telephone Company an additional defendant, and filed an amendment to his complaint, which said amendment added Count II and claimed damages for injuries arising out of the same accident against the new defendant, General Telephone Company.

Thereafter, defendant Thompson moved for a summary judgment. This motion was allowed and the court entered the following order: “It is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bohannon v. Joseph T. Ryerson and Sons, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Biagi v. O'CONNORIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peterson v. GwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Henson v. RenshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Micelli v. MicelliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. American Savings & Accounting Supply, Inc. v. SteinhauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. Cannon v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Neukranz v. NeukranzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Valentine v. MoreheadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API