Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Dixon
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Decided February 6, 2018No. 2016–CA–00997–COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT:
*1193¶ 1. William Tracy Dixon (Tracy) filed a motion (1) to terminate or modify his duty to pay alimony to his ex-wife Sandra Michelle Dixon (Michelle) and (2) to terminate his duty to pay child support for his daughter Amanda, whom he alleged was emancipated because she was cohabiting with her boyfriend. The chancellor found that Amanda was not emancipated and that Tracy was not entitled to any modification. We find no reversible error and affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. Michelle and Tracy married in 1992 and had twin girls, Ashton and Amanda, in 1996. They…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Bruce v. BruceMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Franklin v. Franklin Ex Rel. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- London & Stetelman Inc., L & D, LLC, and Andrew D. Stetelman v. Nelson Tackett and Judy Tackett, Both Individually and as Co-Trustees of the Nelson and Judy Tackett Joint Revocable Trust, and Subway Sandwich Shops of Hattiesburg, IncCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020
- Michael E. Rogers v. Robert M. ThamesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
- Ruth Dedeaux v. Coastal Developments Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019