Legal Opinion

Diversion Lake Club v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1933No. 7765PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellant, Diversion Lake Club, instituted this proceeding to restrain appellees R. W. Heath, M. L. Matthews, and Norman Self from trespassing upon its lands riparian to Diversion Lake and Medina river, as a way to reach and fish in the waters of said lake and river; and also to restrain them from using boats and fishing in said waters. By cross-action appellees sought to perpetually restrain appellant from interfering with their right a£ citizens of this state to fish in or take fish from the waters in question, and to use the banks of the lake and river in the exercise of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Willow River Club v. WadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. National Resort Communities, Inc. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. State v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. California Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. California Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  5. State v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API