Legal Opinion
Bea Kay Real Estate Corp. v. Aragon
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 1989No. 88CA0729PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DUBOFSKY.
Defendants appeal the summary judgment entered for plaintiffs. We reverse.
The record reveals that plaintiffs received late notices of increased valuations on their real property for the year 1987. The notices, signed by the county assessor and dated July 27, 1987, stated in part that:
“Due to the late mailing of the enclosed notice, there is insufficient time for the County Board of Equalization to hear objections to the increase in value. Therefore, if after review you feel the new assessed value is incorrect, you may file a written objection to the Board of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. BenbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Modular Communities, Inc. v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Hoffman v. Colorado State Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF PUEBLOColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Portofino Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tenney v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wenner v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Citibank, N.A. v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Yen, LLC v. Jefferson County Board of CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2021