Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crawford v. Barker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 2011No. SC09-1969Published

1DissentLewis, J.

I dissent because I agree with the logical, sound recommendation articulated by the general magistrate and accepted by the Third District Court of Appeal below:

*1258During the course of the marriage, “Linda Crawford — wife” was named as the designated beneficiary of the Deferred Compensation Fund. However, Linda Crawford and Manuel R. Crawford agreed at the time of the signing of the amended mediated settlement agreement that Manuel R. Crawford should get the money from this fund and that he should be the beneficiary. Manuel R. Crawford could have reaffirmed the designation of Linda Crawford had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barker v. CrawfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API