Legal Opinion
Philip I. Warren v. Richland County Circuit Court and Jon Litscher, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 28, 2000No. 99-3560PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Philip Warren petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He claims that the Wisconsin Circuit Court and Department of Corrections violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process when it revoked his probation. The District Court denied Warren’s petition for habeas relief. Warren v. Richland County Circuit Court, et al., No. 99-C234 (W.D.Wis. Sept. 15, 1999). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Warren does not challenge the Wisconsin state courts’ statements of fact. Those facts are entitled to a presumption of correctness and we adopt them here. Kines v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Virsnieks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- James T. Foster v. James M. Schomig, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lawrence Dalton v. Deirdre Battaglia, Warden, State-Ville Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Robert Simpson v. Deirdre Battaglia, Warden, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Myers v. StraubDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.