Legal Opinion

Rose v. Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On motion to strike bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Defendant in error moves to strike the bill of exceptions because not allowed in time. The court below, within sixty-days mentioned in S. L. 1911, pp. 9 and 10, § 1, granted time beyond the term for presenting the bill of exceptions for allowance. Further time was afterwards repeatedly granted, the last several times by consent of the attorney for defendant in error.

In Ransom v. Holland, 66 Colo. 420, 182 Pac. 885, we held that the court could not, after the expiration of the sixty days limit, grant any further extension. In that case, however, the last extension was granted without the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ritchey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Town of Pagosa Springs v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Murphy v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872
  4. Greig v. ClementSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. City of Central v. WilcoxenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. International State Bank v. McGlashanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API