Matter of Horine
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
On April 6, 1995, the Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, Marvin K. Ho-rine, an attorney admitted to practice in this state in 1976, with entering into a business transaction with a client in violation of Rules 1.7(a) and 1.8(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11, the parties have submitted for our approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline. We approve the agreement, which requires that the respondent be publicly reprimanded for the misconduct…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- In re LeibowitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2001