Legal Opinion

Matter of Horine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1996No. 85S00-9504-DI-416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

On April 6, 1995, the Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, Marvin K. Ho-rine, an attorney admitted to practice in this state in 1976, with entering into a business transaction with a client in violation of Rules 1.7(a) and 1.8(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11, the parties have submitted for our approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline. We approve the agreement, which requires that the respondent be publicly reprimanded for the misconduct…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In re LeibowitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API