State v. Cofield
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
The questions presented are: (1) whether racial discrimination in selection of the grand jury foreman involved in this case would vitiate defendant’s indictment and conviction, and (2) whether defendant has made out a prima facie case of such discrimination in the proceedings against him. We answer both questions affirmatively, reverse the Court of Appeals, and remand the case for a hearing so the state may have an opportunity to rebut defendant’s prima facie case.
I
The state’s evidence at trial tended to show that on 25 June 1984 defendant forced his way into the victim’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Frank R. Nickerson v. T.A. Lee Attorney General of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.