Legal Opinion

State v. Cofield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1987No. 789A85PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The questions presented are: (1) whether racial discrimination in selection of the grand jury foreman involved in this case would vitiate defendant’s indictment and conviction, and (2) whether defendant has made out a prima facie case of such discrimination in the proceedings against him. We answer both questions affirmatively, reverse the Court of Appeals, and remand the case for a hearing so the state may have an opportunity to rebut defendant’s prima facie case.

I

The state’s evidence at trial tended to show that on 25 June 1984 defendant forced his way into the victim’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Frank R. Nickerson v. T.A. Lee Attorney General of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API