Legal Opinion
State v. Collins
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 7, 1981No. CR80-516, CA 19942Published
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals his conviction for menacing, ORS 163.190, asserting five assignments of error. Four of the five assignments, as set forth in defendant’s brief, fail to comply with Rule 7.19 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides, in part:
“* * * [Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching a record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered and a brief not complying with the rules may be stricken.”
Accordingly, we decline to consider those four assignments. State v. Cooney, 36 Or App 217, 222, 584 P2d 329 (1978).
The remaining assignment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978