Legal Opinion

State v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1981No. CR80-516, CA 19942Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction for menacing, ORS 163.190, asserting five assignments of error. Four of the five assignments, as set forth in defendant’s brief, fail to comply with Rule 7.19 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides, in part:

“* * * [Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching a record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered and a brief not complying with the rules may be stricken.”

Accordingly, we decline to consider those four assignments. State v. Cooney, 36 Or App 217, 222, 584 P2d 329 (1978).

The remaining assignment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API