Legal Opinion

Scolavino v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLounsberry, J.

This is a motion for the determination summarily of the value of the services rendered and disbursements paid by Weissberger & Leichter, attorneys for the claimant in the above-entitled matter, and also of the value of services rendered and the disbursements paid by Anthony Scolavino, the guardian ad litem of the infant claimant. Authority for such a motion and determination is found in section 474 of the Judiciary Law, as to the attorneys’ services, and in rule 43 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as to the services of the guardian ad litem.

The voluminous affidavit of Weissberger & Leichter,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scolavino v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Scolavino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  3. Amato v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
  4. Martin v. H.C.F. Koch Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Statler v. DodsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API