Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Attorney General of the State v. New Mexico Public Utility Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2000No. 25,439Published

1ConcurrenceSerna, Justice

(specially concurring).

{17} I agree with the majority opinion that the Commission lacked substantial evidence to modify the stipulation in this case. However, I respectfully believe that this appeal raises a more fundamental question: whether the Commission has the authority to modify an unopposed stipulation over the objection of a party to the stipulation or whether the Commission, in such a circumstance, must accept or reject an unopposed stipulation in its entirety. Contrary to the. majority opinion, which assumes that the Commission has authority to modify an unopposed stipulation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dept. of Pub. Advocate v. NJ Bd. of Pub. Ut.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Office of Consumer Advocate v. Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API