Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baysden v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 2011No. COA11-395Published

1DissentBeasley, Judge

After review of the record and the applicable law, I believe that the North Carolina Felony Firearms Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1 (2009), constitutionally applies to Plaintiff, and I would therefore affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the State on that issue. Accordingly, I would review Plaintiff’s other claims on their merits, and would affirm the trial court’s order with regard to those claims as well. Thus, I respectfully dissent.

I

I first address Plaintiff’s contention that the North Carolina Felony Firearms Act (the Act) is unconstitutional as applied to him, as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API